On being an organ

Posted in think

Aggregated effort is extraordinarily powerful at least in part because, given sufficient inter-communication between individual units of effort (let’s call these “cells” though real cells are already aggregates) and some time, aggregates appear to self-coordinate. That is, a functioning aggregate entity begins with individual free-behaving cells and comes to be organized. Because it becomes organized rather than electing or planning its organization, the aggregate entity also “discovers” any function it might have rather than deciding it. Even if each cell is perfectly free-willed and does precisely as it intends, with sufficient communication between these free-willed nodes there can (and maybe must) emerge an aggregate function. It might not be useful, but there will be consistent gross qualities of behaviour that we can describe.

I say that like it’s a fact because it reads better. It’s really a hypothesis. But that’s how the best science fictions starts — what if this (plausible, I think) hypothesis is true?

So cells aggregate to form tissues and organs whose disparate discovered functions allow a great level of aggregation to exist — a human being that acts and thinks and communicates. Is there a particular reason to believe that this is the terminus of these layers of aggregation? Does the chain organelle → cell → tissue → organ → human have to end at human? I’m not sure there is any reason to believe that. And if it’s true that there are higher levels of organization — that human beings could organize into things that could reasonably be seen as beings in their own right (and let’s be clear — we would not have to sense that for it to be true and more than a cell in your body, even if it was self-aware, would sense that there was a human being nearby), what do these beings do and think?

By inventing the Limited Liability Corporate we drew out the first sketch — blueprint even — for what such a super-entity might be. But the LLC is a golem — it’s a crude deliberate structure that does behave in some ways as an aggregate, but still also obeys commands from masters 1. It’s not what we’re really looking for.

Now the key to real aggregation has little to do with the individual elements — you can build powerful aggregates from elements that do no more than know their position in space, know the time, and are able to communicate. The first two functions are specific to certain kinds of applications but the third is the glue: powerful aggregate behaviour emerges when there is sufficient communication between cells. When the volume of data and the speed of transmission, and the delay time between data deliveries all cross some threshold, aggregates emerge and begin to evolve function. With the cells in our body, communication is diverse and information-rich — chemicals are swapped, transacted, reswapped, bought, and sold in myriad currencies, and cells themselves may move from place to place, carrying remote data to distant lands. Specific latencies, throughputs, and bandwidths vary, but the communication creates the aggregation.

In the last ten years the intercommunication between human beings has been skyrocketing. Even in very poor nations, large numbers of individuals have cellular telephones and internet connectivity in some form. Vast volumes of data are being transmitted. It is seductive to think that there are ways to organize this to do something great, and indeed humans are constantly pursuing this — we build non-profit organizations, petitions, companies, secret-santa lists, and on and on in an effort to plan a function for an aggregate entity. More golems here though.

What we should be looking for is the emergent entity — consistent behaviour that exists not as a matter of individual intention, but in spite of individual interests. This would be evidence that there are (not is — while the boundary between humans-as-animals is clear, the boundary between humans-as-minds is practically non-existent) super-entities that we do not control in any interesting fashion. Perhaps our golems incidentally provide aggregation of us-as-cells into functions that allow the existence of something much greater and wholly unintentional.

This is where the concept of “artificial intelligence” and, indeed, of transhumanism ceases to be relevant. It’s not possible, impossible, utopian, or inevitable — it’s irrelevant. Any artificial intelligence we create at this point will be just one more cell in these super-organisms. Any amazing changes that happen to humans are simply modifications to cells in a greater structure. As we improve communication, we make these super-entities inevitable and they (even if they exist today) have the power to shape the whole planet, and rapidly, in ways that suit their interests.

And their interests are not our interests except insofar as we keep talking to each other. Anything else they do has nothing to do with us at all. If this were already true, what would be the signs? It we could detect that it was about to happen, would we want to stop it? Could we?

Are new organisms ever still-born from cellular revolt?

–BMurray

  1. Though let’s be clear here. Companies — indeed every organization of humans — appear to  rapidly acquire self-interest. Just like any animal, they rapidly adopt behaviours that are solely about staying alive, even when every individual with an interest in it would be better off if it died and was re-constructed or even left dead. All organizations attempt to self-perpetuate regardless of individual interests. They desperately cling to life.
Posted by halfjack   @   19 November 2009

Related Posts

Like this post? Share it!

RSS Digg Twitter StumbleUpon Delicious Technorati Facebook

11 Comments

Comments
Nov 19, 2009
12:09
#1 Chris A. (CodexArcanum) :

Emergent is right, but I sometimes wonder who might really be trying to steer such a thing. I mean, even a human body has a brain, and cells a nucleus. Look at something like Google Search. By conglomerating all that data together, they can build a rather accurate picture of what the mega-being is doing.

I think the Internet really is the fetus of our collective being. We’ll gradually wire ourselves deeper into it until every person is always connected with every other one. Then the aggregate will really take off.

Nov 19, 2009
14:26
#2 Roger :

Sure — this is how free markets work.

Nov 19, 2009
16:28
#3 halfjack :

Roger, that’s kind of scary. If true, it means that “the invisible hand of the marketplace” has non-human motives. Which actually explains a lot.

Nov 20, 2009
12:27
#4 Bob :

Humans have organized themselves into “corporate groups” long before the invention of limited liability. In fact, this sort of social/economic organization predates chiefdoms and states. Furthermore, many cultures have used such an approach successfully for generations. It could be argued that the disfunction of corporations is a relatively recent phenomenon.

Nov 20, 2009
12:30
#5 halfjack :

Bob, very true. The LLC is interesting because we grant this new entity certain kinds of rights previously given only to humans and at the same time remove some kinds of ethical obligation from humans-as-participants. That’s weird. Some have said it’s the most amazing thing humans have ever done.

Nov 20, 2009
13:24
#6 Bob :

Well, its not really all that different from a religion or a cult, where the actions of the participants are justified as they are in accordance with the instructions of their god. In both cases there is ultimately a human who is responsible and benefiting, but shielding themselves from consequences.

Nov 20, 2009
14:02
#7 Bob :

Furthermore… I should add that I agree with much of what you say, except I don’t think it is correct to think of it as something new. If humans are on the cusp of creating some new aggregate organism, it not so much the result of ‘recent’ happenings, but rather more of the same as what humans have been doing for many thousands of years, but on a much larger scale.

Nov 20, 2009
14:10
#8 halfjack :

Bob, I think that the current degree of connectivity is what’s radically new. This is the difference between free-moving protozoa and colonial organisms. Humans are now as close (in high densities) to each other in communicative terms as neurons in a brain. I’m as close communicatively to a billion people today as I would have been to ten (assuming I was at the pub) a hundred years ago. This has never been the case before — information has never moved at a rate and at a volume within many orders of magnitude previously. If there is an opportunity for something new, it’s now. Can we think of organizations a thousand years ago as being a kind of aggregate intelligence? I think certainly we can, but what is now or soon possible is as different from that as apes from fish. Very similar when viewed in certain ways. Very, very different in others.

Nov 21, 2009
13:32
#9 Bob :

As a student of prehistory, I think I naturally resist the temptation to think of “our time” as somehow special or unique, or on the cusp of some radical transformation. I think most societies have thought of themselves in a similar manner, but in hindsight, time and time again, it can be viewed simply as natural human arrogance. But, you may well be right. Certainly the changes in our lifetime have been dramatic; and as you point out the scale of our ‘culture’ and efficiency of communications are increasing exponentially. Though, much of the communication that I have seen on the internet is pretty superficial – it seems that everyone has something to say, but few people are actually listening.

Nov 23, 2009
20:48
#10 d7 :

When you get into the really esoteric bits of physics, it’s possible (though debatable) that we’ve been connected for a very long time already. Quantum connections between disparate parts of the universe may send sufficient information in sufficient volumes that such large-scale aggregates have always existed as an inherent feature of the universe.

If so, as you pointed out we’d have no way of recognising such aggregates or having any concept of what they are “for”. If so, too, that doesn’t change that we are undergoing another layer of massive connection, which will itself have its own layered aggregate convoluting the weirdness of the universe.

Philosophy degrees are great for coming up with sci-fi speculation.

Nov 30, 2009
20:38
#11 dagezhu :

Your blog is interesting and I will be reading it more often in the future!

I’m not a biologist, but I’m told that human bodies are really huge colonies of bacteria that have some kind of “emergent property.” I’ll leave this line of inquiry to the technical folks – like you, Mr. Murray!

Leave a Comment

Name

Email

Website

Previous Post
«
Next Post
»
Powered by Wordpress   |   Lunated designed by ZenVerse

Bad Behavior has blocked 84 access attempts in the last 7 days.